This capacity measures the ability to view objectives and goals in an evaluative and wide focused manner. It scores the capacity to avoid strict black and white, narrowly focused or preset thinking and scores the ability to avoid compulsive and non‐yielding beliefs that would tend to ignore evidence and circumstances that would suggest an alternate solution or course of action.
This measures the capacity to balance 3 factors in the realm of immediate or short term planning. First, the ability to coordinate one’s view for how an action ought to be done with a logical, practical and viable alternative action plan; Second, it measures the ability to AVOID overlooking ideas, attitudes and ways of doing things simply because they do not offer an immediate benefit; and third, the ability to balance the inclination to hesitate due to a pursuit of perfection with the need to achieve a practical common sense solution.
This capacity measures one’s ability to value the need for longer range planning due to an appreciation for the power of structure and organization and a freedom from confusion as circumstances create a degree of chaos that can shift one’s focus from a longer range plan and organization to immediate issues. It is the ability to see that future planning can often eliminate a number of the current fire drills that keep happening over and over again due to a lack of future planning.
This is a measure of the capacity to pay attention to immediate, practical matters and to view those issues from a balanced manner that is devoid of rigid, preset thinking that comes from a repetitive “one size fits all solution perspective.” It is also a measure of the ability to resist focusing primarily on what is wrong with a situation and to avoid the tendency to pursue wild “out of the box” solutions that may not connect to the issue at hand.
This is a measure of the ability to balance a strong analytical, logical, clear and conforming analysis and planning while achieving an actual result. Without the result component, this could easily become “analysis paralysis.” As is so often the case, it is a measure of the ability to balance two counter forces‐ strong reliance upon logic and analysis with bottom line results.
This measures the capacity to see the need for following a plan and to be able to recognize the related series of events that support or deviate from that plan. It is the ability to follow a plan and to exercise a reasonable degree of conformity and uniformity toward the plan as time goes by. It is the practice of using reliable foresight to accomplish results rather than hindsight as justification for the problems created due to a failure to follow a plan.
Copyright © 2020 Sygmia - All Rights Reserved.